Story: Mysskin
Cast: Udhayanidhi Stalin, Aditi Rao
Hydari, Nithya Menen, Rajkumar Pitchumani
Music: Ilaiyaraaja
Time: 146 minutes
Bottom-line: A disappointment
Having seen four of Mysskin’s films
till now, I became a fan of his moviemaking style, often experimenting with new
techniques and stories. That was the case till I saw Super Deluxe (which he co-wrote), when he started to bring in the
“more than what you see” film, i.e., merge philosophical messages, religion
etc. with the main story. He should not have done that.
Psycho is the story of a serial killer,
Angulimala (Pitchumani), whose modus operandi involves kidnapping females from
different regions in Coimbatore, beheading them, and displaying their bodies
the next day, stripped to their underwear. One of his victims is radio jockey
Dahini (Hydari). However, as he is about to kill her, she challenges him that
within a week, Gautham (Stalin) will stop him from committing any more murders.
To prove her wrong, the killer keeps her prisoner for 7 more days. Gautham is a
blind musician who is head-over-heels for Dahini. When the police – themselves
clueless – refuse to help him, he seeks the help of a paralysed ex-cop, Kamala
Das (Menen) to help him find Dahini. The events of the next one week form the remainder of the story.
Udhayanidhi Stalin as Gautham |
Before I go further, I’d like to
clarify that this film is by no means a remake of either Hitchcock’s Psycho or Andhadhun. If you haven’t guessed from the names of the characters
already, Psycho is based on a particular chapter in
Buddha’s life, where a serial killer tries to kill Buddha, but on meeting him,
attains enlightenment. The film is far more violent than most other Indian
films, and it also features nudity and conversations about sex, but that’s just
Mysskin breaking barriers of the “typical” Indian film. The initial romance
between Dahini and Gautham is annoying (except for the “Unna Nenachu” song) but
after that, the tale seems to be a taut thriller. But Mysskin compromises on
logic and tries to make this a poetic film, and that’s where the plot loses its
grip.
You can either choose to just
follow wherever Mysskin takes you, but the moment you pause and wonder what’s
going on, you’re lost. The vivid re-enactment of Angulimala’s childhood can
either be praised as a very imaginative portrayal of a disturbed mind, or can
be thought of as a fancy gimmick with a lot of screaming. Apart from all these,
Psycho has enough examples of Mysskin’s quintessential
techniques – close-ups of feet, 75% of the film being shot in the dark and of
course, the violence. There’s a lot of blood on screen but I must appreciate
the edits and camerawork that still capture the brutality of a beheading without
being entirely explicit.
While Pitchumani’s character gets by with hardly any facial expressions - except in the climax, where he has done really well - Gautham could have been portrayed so much better by many other people; why Stalin?!. The standout performer is Nithya Menen – certainly one of the last people you would expect to portray a
foul-mouthed, short-tempered paralysed cop. Hydari’s “innocent” face must have
been pretty much the only criterion to choose her to play the role, which, in
the end, does work out.
Psycho is certainly the result of a lot
of experimentation, but I felt it was a bit too much of it. In many ways an
unorthodox film, it does provide entertainment, but after a point, you just
want to fast-forward to the end or walk away from the screen. I doubt Hitchcock
would have approved of this.
My rating: 2/5